Performance for non-protected type Blu-ray files was also significant in both cases. When tests were performed for DVD and VCDs then both players performed better while handling all menus and elements with ease.

However, both these players found difficulties for seeking track over WMV files but VLC somehow managed the longer jumps. MPC performed better for almost all media file tests but its performance decayed little bit with old MPEG-1 file format. Even the 4K content was displayed well on MPC-HC but VLC caused little loss for frames while missing the smoothness in between. When video files were tested on both these platforms, MPC-HC provides decent results. MPC-HC retains its size even when video loops are formed but VLC immediately holds back the control to whole screen whenever playbacks start. It keeps all things at right place for both full screen and small screen modes whereas in case of VLC, users often need to organise a search for their desired content. The real difference lies between their features and menus where MPC-HC offers much organized service. On the other side, VLC offers quite clunky icons with deep orange color that most of the time appear irritating to eyes. The design for MPC-HC is actually derived from its predecessor Media Player Classic and it originally follows the design track of Windows XP/95 Media player. There are very limited things to talk about user interfaces of both these software they are quite simple. Comparison of VLC and MPC: User Interface: The article below can help you to make detailed comparison between VLC and MPC probably you will soon be able to decide the right solution for your needs. Both of these software offer unique media management services but when it comes to professional level real time applications then careful selection becomes essential. There are two potential competitors in video player market VLC and MPC.

123 player